journalists

Australian_of_the_year600

01 Aug: Adam Goodes and the hunt for racists

There are three very good reasons why fans boo part-Aboriginal football star, Adam Goodes.  Any person, Aboriginal or not, making provocative gesures like this, is sure to rile the crowd  Goodes finishes his war dance with the up-you gesture – sure to please the crowd Firstly, Goodes showed himself to be a racially-divisive person following his controversial nomination as Australian of the Year. He only achieved this exalted position because the selection committee, the Board of the Australia Day National Council, had been infiltrated by a bunch of politically correct social justice warriors. Goodes immediately used his position to vilify white Australians. “Europeans, and the governments that have run our country, have raped, killed and stolen,” he wrote in Fairfax newspapers. Coming to grips with his part-Aboriginal ancestry has left Goodes with deep-seated anger and a notable hatred of white Australia. Goodes then became infamous when a 13-year-old white girl…

21 Nov: Pauline Hanson: Press Council head slams media ‘feeding frenzy’

Media bias exposed in Hanson attacks The head of the Australian Press Council was forced to criticise the media over its anti-Hanson attacks, as reported in The West Australian on 27/10/97 : The media have gone into a “feeding frenzy” over Independent MP Pauline Hanson and were to blame for resulting damage to Australia‘s reputation, according to the head of the Australian Press Council. Professor David Flint, addressing the ninth conference of the Samuel Griffith Society in Perth yesterday, said such damage could not be blamed on politicians. “It was media indulging in its own fantasies, believing its own stories, which turned Ms Hanson into a spectre stalking the land,” he said. “Her message was presented in some quarters as if it were the voice of Satan. In fact, her views are more moderate than manyright-wing parties in Western Europe,” he said. Media create the “race debate” The media have…

21 Nov: Pauline Hanson: Australian media a threat to democracy

Martin Lehmann – 1 February 2001 One million Australian voters were dis-enfranchised at the last Federal election due to blatant media interference in the democratic process. The One Nation party received one million votes but did not get one member elected in the House of Representatives.  With the looming WA state election, the media has again demonstrated its dangerous control over the political process by threatening retaliation against any political party daring to do a preference swap with One Nation. How did such an undemocratic situation occur? When the power elites, comprising the two major political parties and the media barons, realised the One Nation party could pose a threat to their cosy oligarchy they set out to destroy the party and its leader, Pauline Hanson. The Murdoch press led the charge. In a disgraceful display it vilified Pauline Hanson at every turn. Other media outlets and journalists followed blindly…

16 Sep: Feminist influence in the courts: the diabolical episode of the 30-second rapist

Anna Marshall Following pressure from feminist groups, the Western Australian parliament in 1985 dramatically amended the law relating to rape, first by changing the term rape to sexual assault and then greatly widening the definition of what could be classed as sexual assault.  Many acts not previously constituting rape were included in the new Act. The criteria for sexual assault Kevin Ibbs life was riuned by two conniving women who conspired to have him charged with rape was widened to include any type of penetration by any object or any part of another person’s body where consent was not present and ongoing. It did not matter that force or threats were not  used.  The penalty for any type of sexual assault was increased to fifteen years imprisonment. Where any type of force was used, the charge was aggravated sexual assault, carrying a penalty of twenty years imprisonment. The draconian Act…

17 Sep: Domestic violence – women licensed to kill by Australian courts

Anna Marshall On March 3, 2006, a woman who shot dead her husband from a “sniper’s nest” at their central Victorian property walked free from an Australian court after being charged with the murder of her husband. Not only was it murder, it was, according to the prosecution, a cold-blooded and calculated execution.   Claire Margaret MacDonald walks free from  court after killing her husband On 30 September 2004, primary school teacher, Claire Margaret MacDonald, aged 39 at the time, put on a camouflage outfit and rubber gloves, grabbed her husband’s high powered rifle and hid in the bushes near where the family’s Land Rover was parked in a paddock on the couple’s property in Acheron in Victoria, and waited for her husband to arrive. She lured him to the spot by telling him the Land Rover’s battery was flat. She loaded five bullets into the magazine and kept a…