.jpg)
Social justice warriors believe in an extreme left-wing ideology that combines feminism, progressivism, and political correctness into a totalitarian system that attempts to censor speech and promote fringe lifestyles while actively discriminating against men, particularly white men. They are the internet activist arm of Western progressivism that acts as a vigilante group to ensure compliance and homogeny of far left thought.
Social justice warriors believe in an extreme left-wing ideology that combines feminism, progressivism, and political correctness into a totalitarian system that attempts to censor speech while actively discriminating against men, particularly white men. They are the internet activist arm of Western progressivism that acts as a vigilante group to ensure compliance and homogeny of far left thought.
 |
| 2016 Australian of the Year and SJW, David Morrison. He receives up to $15,000 for speaking engagements while advocating for gender and diversity issues. He has promised to carry on Rosie Batty’s anti-male crusade. |
The true definition of SJW is up for debate, but most generally it has become a catch-all term that describes feminists, progressives, Greens members, cultural Marxists and members of extreme left groups such as Socialist Alliance who actively try to solve the perceived social injustices of modern society by organizing in online communities to disseminate propaganda and censor speech.
Those who proudly adopt the title express a mix of sensitivity to social issues coupled with an aggressive and almost militant outrage at any perceived injustice.
Often they are people with paper thin skin who always find something to be offended about.
They specialise in race, gender, ethnic and pro-Islamic causes.
Although admittedly not extreme left-wingers, the last three Australians of the Year fit into the category of social justice warriors – which says something about the Australian of the Year selection panels.
 |
|
2015 Australian of the Year and SJW, Rosie Batty. She used her personal tragedy to demonise men in her domestic violence campaign that labels all perpetrators as male. Batty has said Australia still struggled to call out domestic violence for what is was – men’s violence against women. This is an extremely provocative and divisive falsehood, when one in three victims of domestic violence is a male. |
Who could forget part-Aboriginal footballer, Adam Goodes who shamefully abused his position of 2014 Australian of the Year, using his soapbox to vilify our past, and preach division. He was dubbed by many as “Un-Australian of the Year”
Commenting on a the film, Utopia, by another un-Australian, John Pilger, the former Swans captain denounced “our very dark past, a brutal history of dispossession, theft and slaughter”.
“Europeans, and the governments that have run our country, have raped, killed and stolen,” he wrote in Fairfax newspapers. (See also Adam Goodes and the hunt for racists)
SJWs in America are waging a bitter war on society where they use fear mongering and bullying to police language, enforce censorship and unfairly discredit those who deviate from their position. They have punished individuals by getting them terminated from their employment. They have also been successful at positioning themselves in the upper echelons of universities, media organizations, and tech companies.
‘What you’re seeing is how a civilization commits suicide,” says Camille Paglia in an interview with Bari Weiss of the Wall Street Journal. This self-described “notorious Amazon feminist” isn’t telling anyone to Lean In or asking Why Women Still Can’t Have It All. No, her indictment may be as surprising as it is wide-ranging: The military is out of fashion, Americans undervalue manual labor, schools neuter male students, opinion makers deny the biological differences between men and women, and sexiness is dead. And that’s just 20 minutes of our three-hour conversation.
 |
| Camille Paglia |
When Ms. Paglia, burst onto the national stage in 1990 with the publishing of “Sexual Personae,” she immediately established herself as a feminist who was the scourge of the movement’s establishment, a heretic to its orthodoxy. Pick up the 700-page tome, subtitled “Art and Decadence From Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson,” and it’s easy to see why. “If civilization had been left in female hands,” she wrote, “we would still be living in grass huts.”
But no subject gets her going more than what she sees as the connection between society’s attempts to paper over the biological distinction between men and women and the collapse of Western civilization.
Many TV commercials depict females as clever and all-knowing while they depict males as bumbling fools, but never the other way around. Some examples:
University texts have become feminised and anti-male. Following university indoctrination, the more activist teachers are disseminating the anti-male propaganda, telling their classes for example, that the reasons for wars is the innately violent nature of men (see below, “A word from a feminist”).
American sitcoms are replete with images of oafish, bumbling males who constantly need assistance from smart, smug females.
American crime shows such as Law & Order – Special Victims Unit depict men as evil rapists and murderers. Stabler, the former male star of SVU took great delight in slamming each male suspect up against the wall and hissing “you low-life scumbag” in his face. On the rare occasion the detectives apprehend a woman suspect they treat her very gently because there must have been a good reason she murdered her child.
All of the negative images of males is having a devastating effect on the morale of young boys. “They are soaking up these negative images”, says Don Bowak, NSW president of the Men’s Health and Well-Being Association. “There’s huge anger and they don’t even know where it is coming from”.
The following article is an excerpt from the forthcoming book by Kenneth Schultz, The Decline and Imminent Fall of the West. In this article:
Decades of a virulent anti-male narrative by radical feminists has resulted in negative stereotypes of males being embedded in our culture. If you are a white, heterosexual male, who hasn’t succumbed to political correctness and therefore can still think for yourself, you are probably sick of the put-down of men in TV commercials, sitcoms and movies and the outright slandering of men by the domestic violence industry.
In a world where the cultural dialogue is dominated by feminists still complaining that men have all the power yet the truth in most Western countries, is that many of our laws, attitudes and social conventions make life tough for men, going so far at times to demonise men.
How many times have you watched TV commercials and sitcoms depicting males as dim-witted, bumbling oafs outwitted by smug, all-knowing females?
Or TV shows such as Criminal Minds that routinely depict males as violent, sadistic and depraved serial killers?
And SVU: Special Victims Unit, where the overwhelming majority of perpetrators are male (usually white).
Many men are incensed at their treatment in the courts and in police proceedings.
Anna Marshall Following pressure from feminist groups, the Western Australian parliament in 1985 dramatically amended the law relating to rape, first by changing the term rape to sexual assault and then greatly widening the definition of what could be classed as sexual assault. Many acts not previously constituting rape were included in the new Act. The criteria for sexual assault Kevin Ibbs life was riuned by two conniving women who conspired to have him charged with rape was widened to include any type of penetration by any object or any part of another person’s body where consent was not present and ongoing. It did not matter that force or threats were not used. The penalty for any type of sexual assault was increased to fifteen years imprisonment. Where any type of force was used, the charge was aggravated sexual assault, carrying a penalty of twenty years imprisonment. The draconian Act…