Scroll Top

Woolwich murder: Islam shows its true face

“We swear by almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you. You people will never be safe”

These revealing words by Michael Adebolajo, one the killers of soldier, Lee Rigby, casts light on the true nature of Islam.

In extraordinary broad daylight scenes in Woolwich, the men ran the soldier down in a car then tried to hack the man’s head off and have their own crime filmed. Beheading is a centuries-old Muslim method of executing enemies of Islam.

Britain’s Muslim leaders angrily condemned  the slaughter. They were angry because the murderers got ahead of themselves. These incidents are not supposed to occur until the Muslim infiltration of the West puts them in a strong enough position to use violence, assassinations and hostage-taking to further their ends.

In the meantime the Muslim leaders follow the dictates of the Koran by practising taqiyya.

Muhammad and his followers gained many of their victories through  deception. The Islamic principle of taqiyya – lying for the sake of Allah – allows  a believer to conceal his true intentions in order to advance the cause of Islam.

The massive Muslim migration to Western nations is part of the stealth jihad to Islamise the West. Cowering politicians and the politically correct, left-wing media have been hiding from this inescapable truth for decades.

Muslim authorities such as the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), the tyrannical organisation of fifty-seven Islamic countries, many of them barbaric dictatorships use their power to bully Western nations into submitting to Islam’s diktats.

At a local level, a multitude of Islamic groups use stealth tactics to slowly bring in Islamic principles including Shariah law, segregated swimming pools and special treatments for Muslims.

That their stealth jihad is working is evidenced by the way they have positioned themselves in Western societies.

Almost universally, authorities, politicians and mainstream journalists compartmentalise people into one of three groups when dealing with, or reporting on Islam and Muslims.

The first group contains the small number of “extremists” who carry out savage attacks like the Woolwich beheading and the Boston bombing. They are categorised as “radicals” from the “fringes” and do not represent true Islam.

Then there are  the vast number of “moderate” Muslims who say they abhor these acts but say little  publicly about it.

The third grouping are categorised as extremists from the “far Right” and the “racists”. There is no in-between, such as people who are concerned about the future of their countries. If they speak out, Muslim authorities and unthinking, left-wing  journalists (the vast majority of journalists)  put then into category three.

This is a brilliant branding exercise on the part of the Islamic associations.

But many Islamic leaders reject the idea they are “moderates”. 

Turkey’s Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, is often upheld in the West as a moderate, but he himself rejected that term when speaking on Turkish television 21 August 2007, claiming it is “very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate Islam, Islam is Islam and that’s it”.

Yet, in an extraordinary act of appeasement to the Islamists, British Prime Minister declared the Woolwich murder “as a betrayal of Islam”.

Related Posts

Leave a comment